The ccfindR (Cancer Clone findeR) package1 contains implementations and utilities for analyzing single-cell RNA-sequencing data, including quality control, unsupervised clustering for discovery of cell types, and visualization of the outcomes. It is especially suitable for analysis of transcript-count data utilizing unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), e.g., data derived from 10x Genomics platform. In these data sets, RNA counts are non-negative integers, enabling clustering using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF)2.

Input data are UMI counts in the form of a matrix with each genetic feature (“genes”) in rows and cells (tagged by barcodes) in columns, produced by read alignment and counting pipelines. The count matrix and associated gene and cell annotation files are bundled into a main object of class scNMFSet, which extends the SingleCellExperiment class [http://dx.doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.SingleCellExperiment)]. Quality control for both cells and genes can be performed via filtering steps based on UMI counts and variance of expressions, respectively. The NMF factorization is first performed for multiple values of ranks (the reduced dimension of factorization) to find the most likely value. A production run for the chosen rank then leads to factor matrices, allowing the user to identify and visualize genes representative of clusters and assign cells into clusters.

1 Algorithm

The NMF approach offers a means to identify cell subtypes and classify individual cells into these clusters based on clustering using expression counts. In contrast to alternatives such as principal component analyses3, NMF leverages the non-negative nature of count data and factorizes the data matrix \(\sf X\) into two factor matrices \(\sf W\) and \(\sf H\)2:

\[\begin{equation} \sf{X} \sim {\sf W}{\sf H}. \end{equation}\]

If \(\sf X\) is a \(p\times n\) matrix (\(p\) genes and \(n\) cells), the basis matrix \(\sf W\) is \(p \times r\) and coefficient matrix \(\sf H\) is \(r \times n\) in dimension, respectively, where the rank \(r\) is a relatively small integer. A statistical inference-based interpretation of NMF is to view \(X_{ij}\) as a realization of a Poisson distribution with the mean for each matrix element given by \(({\sf WH})_{ij}\equiv \Lambda_{ij}\), or

\[\begin{equation} \Pr(x_{ij})=\frac{e^{-\Lambda_{ij}}{\Lambda_{ij}}^{x_{ij}}} {\Gamma(1+x_{ij})}. \end{equation}\]

The maximum likelihood inference of the latter is then achieved by maximizing

\[\begin{equation} L = \sum_{ij} \left(X_{ij} \ln \frac{\Lambda_{ij}}{X_{ij}}- \Lambda_{ij}+X_{ij}\right). \end{equation}\]

The Kullback-Leibler measure of the distance between \(\sf X\) and \(\sf \Lambda\), which is minimized, is equal to \(-L\). Lee and Seung’s update rule2 solves this optimization task iteratively.

While also including this classical iterative update algorithm to find basis and coefficient factors of the count matrix, the main workhorse in ccfindR is the variational Bayesian inference algorithm proposed by Cemgil4. Thus the key distinguishing features of ccfindR1 compared to other existing implementations – NMF for generic data5 and NMFEM for single-cell analysis6 – are

  • Bayesian inference allowing for a statistically well-controlled procedure to determine the most likely value of rank \(r\).
  • Procedure to derive hierarchical relationships among clusters identified under different ranks.

In particular, a traditional way (in maximum likelihood inference) to determine the rank is to evaluate the factorization quality measures (and optionally compare with those from randomized data). The Bayesian formulation of NMF algorithm instead incorporates priors for factored matrix elements \(\sf W\) and \(\sf H\) modeled by gamma distributions. Inference can be combined with hyperparameter update to optimize the marginal likelihood (ML; conditional probability of data under hyperparameters and rank), which provides a statistically well-controlled means to determine the optimal rank describing data.

For large rank values, it can be challenging to interpret clusters identified. To facilitate biological interpretation, we provide a procedure where cluster assignment of cells is repeated for multiple rank values, typically ranging from 2 to the optimal rank, and a phylogenetic tree connecting different clusters at neighboring rank values are constructed. This tree gives an overview of different types of cells present in the system viewed at varying resolution.

2 Workflow

We illustrate a typical workflow with a single-cell count data set generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) data [https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/datasets/1.1.0/]. The particular data set used below was created by sampling from five purified immune cell subsets.

2.1 Installation

To install the package, do the following:

BiocManager::install('ccfindR')

After installation, load the package by

library(ccfindR)

2.2 Data input

The input data can be a simple matrix:

# A toy matrix for count data
set.seed(1)
mat <- matrix(rpois(n = 80, lambda = 2), nrow = 4, ncol = 20)
ABC <- LETTERS[1:4]
abc <- letters[1:20]
rownames(mat) <- ABC
colnames(mat) <- abc

The main S4 object containing data and subsequent analysis outcomes is of class scNMFSet, created by

# create scNMFSet object
sc <- scNMFSet(count = mat)

This class extends SingleCellExperiment class, adding extra slots for storing factorization outcomes. In particular, assays, rowData, and colData slots of SingleCellExperiment class are used to store RNA count matrix, gene, and cell annotation data frames, respectively. In the simplest initialization above, the named argument count is used as the count matrix and is equivalent to

# create scNMFSet object
sc <- scNMFSet(assays = list(counts = mat))

See SingleCellExperiment documentations for more details of these main slots. For instance, row and column names can be stored by

# set row and column names
suppressMessages(library(S4Vectors))
genes <- DataFrame(ABC)
rownames(genes) <- ABC
cells <- DataFrame(abc)
rownames(cells) <- abc
sc <- scNMFSet(count = mat, rowData = genes, colData = cells)
sc
## class: scNMFSet 
## dim: 4 20 
## rownames: [1] "A" "B" "C" "D"
## colnames: [1] "a" "b" "c" "d" "e" "f"

Alternatively, sparse matrix format (of class dgCMatrix) can be used. A MatrixMarket format file can be read directly:

# read sparse matrix
dir <- system.file('extdata', package = 'ccfindR')
mat <- Matrix::readMM(paste0(dir,'/matrix.mtx'))
rownames(mat) <- 1:nrow(mat)
colnames(mat) <- 1:ncol(mat)
sc <- scNMFSet(count = mat, rowData = DataFrame(1:nrow(mat)),
               colData = DataFrame(1:ncol(mat)))
sc
## class: scNMFSet 
## dim: 1030 450 
## rownames: [1] "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"
## colnames: [1] "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"

The number of rows in assays$counts and rowData, the number of columns in assays$counts and rows in colData must match.

The gene and barcode meta-data and count files resulting from 10x Genomics’ Cell Ranger pipeline (https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/pipelines/latest/what-is-cell-ranger) can also be read:

# read 10x files
sc <- read_10x(dir = dir, count = 'matrix.mtx', genes = 'genes.tsv',
               barcodes = 'barcodes.tsv')
sc
## class: scNMFSet 
## dim: 1030 450 
## rownames: [1] "ENSG00000187608" "ENSG00000186891" "ENSG00000127054" "ENSG00000158109"
## [5] "ENSG00000116251" "ENSG00000074800"
## colnames: [1] "ATGCAGTGCTTGGA-1" "CATGTACTCCATGA-1" "GAGAAATGGCAAGG-1"
## [4] "TGATATGACGTTAG-1" "AGTAGGCTCGGGAA-1" "TGACCGCTGTAGCT-1"

The parameter dir is the directory containing the files. Filenames above are the defaults and can be omitted. The function returns an scNMFSet object. By default, any row or column entirely consisting of zeros in counts and the corresponding elements in rowData and colData slots will be removed. This feature can be turned off by remove.zeros = FALSE.

2.3 Quality control

For quality control, cells and genes can be filtered manually using normal subsetting syntax of R: the slots in the object sc are accessed and edited using accessors and sub-setting rules; see SingleCellExperiment:

# slots and subsetting
counts(sc)[1:7,1:3]
## 7 x 3 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
##                 ATGCAGTGCTTGGA-1 CATGTACTCCATGA-1 GAGAAATGGCAAGG-1
## ENSG00000187608                .                2                .
## ENSG00000186891                .                .                .
## ENSG00000127054                .                .                .
## ENSG00000158109                .                .                .
## ENSG00000116251                .                3                .
## ENSG00000074800                2                .                .
## ENSG00000162444                .                .                .
head(rowData(sc))
## DataFrame with 6 rows and 2 columns
##                              V1          V2
##                     <character> <character>
## ENSG00000187608 ENSG00000187608       ISG15
## ENSG00000186891 ENSG00000186891    TNFRSF18
## ENSG00000127054 ENSG00000127054      CPSF3L
## ENSG00000158109 ENSG00000158109      TPRG1L
## ENSG00000116251 ENSG00000116251       RPL22
## ENSG00000074800 ENSG00000074800        ENO1
head(colData(sc))
## DataFrame with 6 rows and 1 column
##                                V1
##                       <character>
## ATGCAGTGCTTGGA-1 ATGCAGTGCTTGGA-1
## CATGTACTCCATGA-1 CATGTACTCCATGA-1
## GAGAAATGGCAAGG-1 GAGAAATGGCAAGG-1
## TGATATGACGTTAG-1 TGATATGACGTTAG-1
## AGTAGGCTCGGGAA-1 AGTAGGCTCGGGAA-1
## TGACCGCTGTAGCT-1 TGACCGCTGTAGCT-1
sc2 <- sc[1:20,1:70]       # subsetting of object
sc2 <- remove_zeros(sc2)   # remove empty rows/columns
## 6 empty rows removed
sc2
## class: scNMFSet 
## dim: 14 70 
## rownames: [1] "ENSG00000187608" "ENSG00000186891" "ENSG00000127054" "ENSG00000158109"
## [5] "ENSG00000116251" "ENSG00000074800"
## colnames: [1] "ATGCAGTGCTTGGA-1" "CATGTACTCCATGA-1" "GAGAAATGGCAAGG-1"
## [4] "TGATATGACGTTAG-1" "AGTAGGCTCGGGAA-1" "TGACCGCTGTAGCT-1"

We provide two streamlined functions each for cell and gene filtering, which are illustrated below:

sc <- filter_cells(sc, umi.min = 10^2.6, umi.max = 10^3.4)
Quality control filtering of cells. Histogram of UMI counts is shown. Cells can be selected (red) by setting lower and upper thresholds of the UMI count.

Figure 1: Quality control filtering of cells
Histogram of UMI counts is shown. Cells can be selected (red) by setting lower and upper thresholds of the UMI count. 

## 438 cells out of 450 selected
## 21 empty rows removed
markers <- c('CD4','CD8A','CD8B','CD19','CD3G','CD3D',
             'CD3Z','CD14')
sc0 <- filter_genes(sc, markers = markers, vmr.min = 1.5, 
            min.cells.expressed = 50, rescue.genes = FALSE)
## 5 marker genes found
## 297 variable genes out of 1009 
## 299 genes selected
Selection of genes for clustering. The scatter plot shows distributions of expression variance to mean ratio (VMR) and the number of cells expressed. Minimum VMR and a range of cell number can be set to select genes (red). Symbols in orange are marker genes provided as input, selected irrespective of expression variance.

Figure 2: Selection of genes for clustering
The scatter plot shows distributions of expression variance to mean ratio (VMR) and the number of cells expressed. Minimum VMR and a range of cell number can be set to select genes (red). Symbols in orange are marker genes provided as input, selected irrespective of expression variance.

The function filter_cells() plots histogram of UMI counts for all cells when called without threshold parameters (Fig. 1). This plot can be used to set desirable thresholds, umi.min and umi.max. Cells with UMI counts outside will be filtered out. The function filter_genes() displays scatter plot of the total number of cells with nonzero count and VMR (variance-to-mean ratio) for each gene (Fig. 2). In both plots, selected cells and genes are shown in red. Note that the above example has thresholds that are too stringent, which is intended to speed up the subsequent illustrative runs. A list of pre-selected marker genes can be provided to help identify clusters via the markers parameter in filter_genes(). Here, we use a set of classical PBMC marker genes (shown in orange).

Gene-filtering can also be augmented by scanning for those genes whose count distributions among cells are non-trivial: most have zero count as its maximum; some have one or more distinct peaks at nonzero count values. These may signify the existence of groups of cells in which the genes are expressed in distinguishable fashion. The selection of genes by filter_genes() will be set as the union of threshold-based group and those with such nonzero-count modes by setting rescue.genes = TRUE:

sc_rescue <- filter_genes(sc, markers = markers, vmr.min = 1.5, min.cells.expressed = 50,
                          rescue.genes = TRUE, progress.bar = FALSE)
## Looking for genes with modes ...
## 5 marker genes found
## 297 variable genes out of 1009 
## 36 additional genes rescued
## 333 genes selected
Additional selection of genes with modes at nonzero counts. Symbols in blue represent genes rescued.

Figure 3: Additional selection of genes with modes at nonzero counts
Symbols in blue represent genes rescued.

This “gene rescue” scan will take some time and a progress bar is displayed if progress.bar = TRUE.

For subsequent analysis, we will use the latter selection and also name rows with gene symbols:

rownames(sc_rescue) <- rowData(sc_rescue)[,2]
sc <- sc_rescue

2.4 Rank determination

The main function for maximum likelihood NMF on a count matrix is factorize(). It performs a series of iterative updates to matrices \(\sf W\) and \(\sf H\). Since the global optimum of likelihood function is not directly accessible, computational inference relies on local maxima, which depends on initializations. We adopt the randomized initialization scheme, where the factor matrix elements are drawn from uniform distributions. To make the inference reproducible, one can set the random number seed by set.seed(seed), where seed is a positive integer, prior to calling factorize(). Updates continue until convergence is reached, defined by either the fractional change in likelihood being smaller than Tol (criterion = likelihood) or a set number (ncnn.step) of steps observed during which the connectivity matrix remains unchanged (criterion = connectivity). The connectivity matrix \(\sf C\) is a symmetric \(n\times n\) matrix with elements \(C_{jl}=1\) if \(j\) and \(l\) cells belong to the same cluster and \(0\) otherwise. The cluster membership is dynamically checked by finding the row index \(k\) for which the coefficient matrix element \(H_{kj}\) is maximum for each cell indexed by \(j\).

During iteration, with verbose = 3, step number, log likelihood per elements, and the number of terms in the upper-diagonal part of \(\sf C\) that changed from the previous step are printed:

set.seed(1)
sc <- factorize(sc, ranks = 3, nrun = 1, ncnn.step = 1, 
                criterion='connectivity', verbose = 3)
## Rank 3
## Run # 1 :
## 1 : likelihood =  -0.8647969 , connectivity change =  95703 
## 2 : likelihood =  -0.8517807 , connectivity change =  5038 
## 3 : likelihood =  -0.8433066 , connectivity change =  4126 
## 4 : likelihood =  -0.8365106 , connectivity change =  6999 
## 5 : likelihood =  -0.8297726 , connectivity change =  9493 
## 6 : likelihood =  -0.8215592 , connectivity change =  6316 
## 7 : likelihood =  -0.8101781 , connectivity change =  7176 
## 8 : likelihood =  -0.7941406 , connectivity change =  8037 
## 9 : likelihood =  -0.7733155 , connectivity change =  4352 
## 10 : likelihood =  -0.7496513 , connectivity change =  3916 
## 11 : likelihood =  -0.7258222 , connectivity change =  4466 
## 12 : likelihood =  -0.703613 , connectivity change =  3695 
## 13 : likelihood =  -0.6837778 , connectivity change =  1746 
## 14 : likelihood =  -0.6665995 , connectivity change =  3739 
## 15 : likelihood =  -0.6522002 , connectivity change =  3393 
## 16 : likelihood =  -0.6404157 , connectivity change =  1665 
## 17 : likelihood =  -0.6308176 , connectivity change =  2375 
## 18 : likelihood =  -0.6229319 , connectivity change =  1814 
## 19 : likelihood =  -0.6163779 , connectivity change =  1613 
## 20 : likelihood =  -0.6108793 , connectivity change =  1920 
## 21 : likelihood =  -0.6062334 , connectivity change =  3184 
## 22 : likelihood =  -0.6022853 , connectivity change =  1557 
## 23 : likelihood =  -0.59891 , connectivity change =  341 
## 24 : likelihood =  -0.596004 , connectivity change =  959 
## 25 : likelihood =  -0.5934819 , connectivity change =  1228 
## 26 : likelihood =  -0.5912764 , connectivity change =  1272 
## 27 : likelihood =  -0.589335 , connectivity change =  1314 
## 28 : likelihood =  -0.5876163 , connectivity change =  1631 
## 29 : likelihood =  -0.5860863 , connectivity change =  1289 
## 30 : likelihood =  -0.5847182 , connectivity change =  516 
## 31 : likelihood =  -0.5834899 , connectivity change =  1029 
## 32 : likelihood =  -0.5823822 , connectivity change =  0 
## Nsteps = 32 , likelihood = -0.5823822 , dispersion = 1 
## 
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.5823822 , dispersion = 1 , cophenetic = 1

The function factorize() returns the same object sc with extra slots ranks (the rank value for which factorization was performed), basis (a list containing the basis matrix \(\sf W\)), coeff (a list containing the coefficient matrix \(\sf H\)), and measure (a data frame containing the factorization quality measure; see below). The criterion used to stop iteration is either connectivity (no changes to connectivity matrix for ncnn.steps) or likelihood (changes to likelihood smaller than Tol).

To reduce the dependence of final estimates for \(\sf W\) and \(\sf H\) on initial guess, inferences need to be repeated for many different initializations:

sc <- factorize(sc, ranks = 3, nrun = 5, verbose = 2)
## Rank 3
## Run # 1 :
## Nsteps = 166 , likelihood = -0.5674453 , dispersion = 1 
## 
## Run # 2 :
## Nsteps = 267 , likelihood = -0.5899218 , dispersion = 0.7248806 
## 
## Run # 3 :
## Nsteps = 216 , likelihood = -0.5674457 , dispersion = 0.7554495 
## 
## Run # 4 :
## Nsteps = 150 , likelihood = -0.5674499 , dispersion = 0.791724 
## 
## Run # 5 :
## Nsteps = 167 , likelihood = -0.5756824 , dispersion = 0.7451996 
## 
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.5674453 , dispersion = 0.7451996 , cophenetic = 0.9932031

After each run, the likelihood and dispersion are printed, and the global maximum of likelihood as well as the corresponding matrices \(\sf W\) and \(\sf H\) are stored. The dispersion \(\rho\) is a scalar measure of how close the consistency matrix \(\sf{\bar C}\equiv {\rm Mean}({\sf C})\) elements, where \({\sf C}\) is the connectivity matrix, are to binary values \(0,1\). The mean is over multiple runs: \[ \rho=\frac{4}{n^2}\sum_{jl}\left({\bar C}_{jl}-1/2\right)^2.\] Note in the output above that \(\rho\) decays from 1 as the number of runs increases and then stabilizes. This degree of convergence of \(\rho\) is a good indication for the adequacy of nrun. The cophenetic is the correlation between the distance \(1-{\sf{\bar C}}\) and the height matrix of hierarchical clustering7.

To discover clusters of cells, the reduced dimensionality of factorization, or the rank \(r\), must be estimated. The examples above used a single rank value. If the parameter ranks is a vector, the set of inferences will be repeated for each rank value.

sc <- factorize(sc, ranks = seq(3,7), nrun = 5, verbose = 1, progress.bar = FALSE)
## Rank 3
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.567536 , dispersion = 0.8443869 , cophenetic = 0.9936102 
## Rank 4
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.5080955 , dispersion = 0.997508 , cophenetic = 0.9997478 
## Rank 5
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.4842068 , dispersion = 0.9141069 , cophenetic = 0.9849157 
## Rank 6
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.474749 , dispersion = 0.9072246 , cophenetic = 0.9853589 
## Rank 7
## Sample# 1 : Max(likelihood) = -0.4679982 , dispersion = 0.9237614 , cophenetic = 0.9871894

Note that nrun parameter above is set to a small value for illustration. In a real application, typical values of nrun would be larger. The progress bar shown by default under verbose = 1 for overall nrun runs is turned off above. It can be set to TRUE here (and below) to monitor the progress. After factorization, the measure slot has been filled:

measure(sc)
##   rank likelihood dispersion cophenetic
## 1    3 -0.5675360  0.8443869  0.9936102
## 2    4 -0.5080955  0.9975080  0.9997478
## 3    5 -0.4842068  0.9141069  0.9849157
## 4    6 -0.4747490  0.9072246  0.9853589
## 5    7 -0.4679982  0.9237614  0.9871894

These measures can be plotted (Fig. 4):

plot(sc)
Factorization quality measures as functions of the rank. Dispersion measures the degree of bimodality in consistency matrix. Cophenetic correlation measures the degree of agreement between consistency matrix and hierarchical clustering.

Figure 4: Factorization quality measures as functions of the rank
Dispersion measures the degree of bimodality in consistency matrix. Cophenetic correlation measures the degree of agreement between consistency matrix and hierarchical clustering.

2.5 Bayesian NMF

The maximum likelihood-based inference must rely on quality measures to choose optimal rank. Bayesian NMF allows for the statistical comparison of different models, namely those with different ranks. The quantity compared is the log probability (ML or “evidence”) of data conditional to models (defined by rank and hyperparameters). The main function for Bayesian factorization is vb_factorize():

sb <- sc_rescue
set.seed(2)
sb <- vb_factorize(sb, ranks =3, verbose = 3, Tol = 2e-4, hyper.update.n0 = 5)
## 1, log(evidence) = -1.505411, aw = 1, bw = 1, ah = 1, bh = 1
## 2, log(evidence) = -1.575041, aw = 1, bw = 1, ah = 1, bh = 1
## 3, log(evidence) = -1.608358, aw = 1, bw = 1, ah = 1, bh = 1
## 4, log(evidence) = -1.627154, aw = 1, bw = 1, ah = 1, bh = 1
## 5, log(evidence) = -1.639133, aw = 1, bw = 1, ah = 1, bh = 1
## 6, log(evidence) = -1.647411, aw = 0.5245557, bw = 0.9404055, ah = 2.800559, bh = 0.9890178
## 7, log(evidence) = -1.647935, aw = 0.5165306, bw = 0.9402905, ah = 2.876746, bh = 0.9890304
## 8, log(evidence) = -1.651081, aw = 0.5087818, bw = 0.9401596, ah = 2.87484, bh = 0.9890439
## 9, log(evidence) = -1.651345, aw = 0.4976702, bw = 0.9399658, ah = 2.80461, bh = 0.9890581
## 10, log(evidence) = -1.648552, aw = 0.4828468, bw = 0.9397002, ah = 2.679995, bh = 0.9890725
## 11, log(evidence) = -1.642816, aw = 0.4649239, bw = 0.939366, ah = 2.520109, bh = 0.9890867
## 12, log(evidence) = -1.634198, aw = 0.4452534, bw = 0.938978, ah = 2.345064, bh = 0.9891001
## 13, log(evidence) = -1.622659, aw = 0.4256377, bw = 0.9385576, ah = 2.171214, bh = 0.989112
## 14, log(evidence) = -1.608519, aw = 0.4072656, bw = 0.9381276, ah = 2.009665, bh = 0.989122
## 15, log(evidence) = -1.59282, aw = 0.3902048, bw = 0.9377068, ah = 1.866502, bh = 0.9891296
## 16, log(evidence) = -1.577083, aw = 0.3743271, bw = 0.9373079, ah = 1.743545, bh = 0.9891348
## 17, log(evidence) = -1.56265, aw = 0.3599941, bw = 0.9369359, ah = 1.63954, bh = 0.9891376
## 18, log(evidence) = -1.550257, aw = 0.3476776, bw = 0.9365903, ah = 1.551651, bh = 0.9891381
## 19, log(evidence) = -1.54004, aw = 0.337401, bw = 0.9362669, ah = 1.476737, bh = 0.9891362
## 20, log(evidence) = -1.531779, aw = 0.3289474, bw = 0.9359607, ah = 1.412033, bh = 0.989132
## 21, log(evidence) = -1.525123, aw = 0.3218827, bw = 0.9356671, ah = 1.355323, bh = 0.9891255
## 22, log(evidence) = -1.519728, aw = 0.3157648, bw = 0.9353826, ah = 1.304886, bh = 0.9891167
## 23, log(evidence) = -1.5153, aw = 0.3104483, bw = 0.9351046, ah = 1.259403, bh = 0.9891055
## 24, log(evidence) = -1.511599, aw = 0.3058824, bw = 0.9348314, ah = 1.217874, bh = 0.9890919
## 25, log(evidence) = -1.508429, aw = 0.3019294, bw = 0.9345619, ah = 1.179552, bh = 0.9890758
## 26, log(evidence) = -1.505648, aw = 0.2984252, bw = 0.9342954, ah = 1.143879, bh = 0.9890572
## 27, log(evidence) = -1.503154, aw = 0.2952752, bw = 0.9340311, ah = 1.11044, bh = 0.989036
## 28, log(evidence) = -1.500872, aw = 0.2924123, bw = 0.9337688, ah = 1.077925, bh = 0.9890122
## 29, log(evidence) = -1.498747, aw = 0.2897952, bw = 0.933508, ah = 1.048233, bh = 0.9889857
## 30, log(evidence) = -1.496719, aw = 0.2873186, bw = 0.9332484, ah = 1.02002, bh = 0.9889565
## 31, log(evidence) = -1.494763, aw = 0.2849743, bw = 0.9329899, ah = 0.9932674, bh = 0.9889245
## 32, log(evidence) = -1.492861, aw = 0.2828196, bw = 0.9327324, ah = 0.9679112, bh = 0.9888899
## 33, log(evidence) = -1.491012, aw = 0.280967, bw = 0.932476, ah = 0.9438943, bh = 0.9888524
## 34, log(evidence) = -1.489226, aw = 0.2794903, bw = 0.9322207, ah = 0.9211381, bh = 0.988812
## 35, log(evidence) = -1.487523, aw = 0.2783321, bw = 0.9319667, ah = 0.8995274, bh = 0.9887687
## 36, log(evidence) = -1.485911, aw = 0.2773973, bw = 0.9317142, ah = 0.8789431, bh = 0.9887223
## 37, log(evidence) = -1.484367, aw = 0.2766264, bw = 0.9314632, ah = 0.8593442, bh = 0.9886727
## 38, log(evidence) = -1.482874, aw = 0.2759599, bw = 0.9312139, ah = 0.8407493, bh = 0.9886199
## 39, log(evidence) = -1.481428, aw = 0.2753403, bw = 0.9309665, ah = 0.8231597, bh = 0.9885638
## 40, log(evidence) = -1.480027, aw = 0.2747491, bw = 0.9307212, ah = 0.8065463, bh = 0.9885045
## 41, log(evidence) = -1.478667, aw = 0.2742057, bw = 0.9304785, ah = 0.7908618, bh = 0.9884418
## 42, log(evidence) = -1.477339, aw = 0.2737161, bw = 0.9302386, ah = 0.7760516, bh = 0.9883758
## 43, log(evidence) = -1.476032, aw = 0.2732587, bw = 0.9300023, ah = 0.7620592, bh = 0.9883064
## 44, log(evidence) = -1.474736, aw = 0.2728171, bw = 0.9297701, ah = 0.748827, bh = 0.9882337
## 45, log(evidence) = -1.473444, aw = 0.272395, bw = 0.9295428, ah = 0.7362946, bh = 0.9881578
## 46, log(evidence) = -1.472157, aw = 0.2720142, bw = 0.929321, ah = 0.7243985, bh = 0.9880785
## 47, log(evidence) = -1.470875, aw = 0.2716963, bw = 0.9291052, ah = 0.7130831, bh = 0.9879961
## 48, log(evidence) = -1.469597, aw = 0.2714583, bw = 0.9288959, ah = 0.7023144, bh = 0.9879104
## 49, log(evidence) = -1.468322, aw = 0.2713008, bw = 0.9286936, ah = 0.6920732, bh = 0.9878216
## 50, log(evidence) = -1.46706, aw = 0.2712097, bw = 0.9284983, ah = 0.6823365, bh = 0.9877297
## 51, log(evidence) = -1.465826, aw = 0.2711722, bw = 0.9283101, ah = 0.6730705, bh = 0.9876347
## 52, log(evidence) = -1.464635, aw = 0.2711773, bw = 0.9281289, ah = 0.6642343, bh = 0.9875367
## 53, log(evidence) = -1.463494, aw = 0.2712114, bw = 0.9279545, ah = 0.6557894, bh = 0.9874359
## 54, log(evidence) = -1.462395, aw = 0.2712614, bw = 0.9277868, ah = 0.6477044, bh = 0.9873321
## 55, log(evidence) = -1.461326, aw = 0.271326, bw = 0.9276257, ah = 0.6399515, bh = 0.9872256
## 56, log(evidence) = -1.460276, aw = 0.2714255, bw = 0.9274711, ah = 0.632499, bh = 0.9871164
## 57, log(evidence) = -1.459241, aw = 0.2715837, bw = 0.9273225, ah = 0.6253032, bh = 0.9870045
## 58, log(evidence) = -1.458231, aw = 0.2718038, bw = 0.9271793, ah = 0.6182993, bh = 0.9868901
## 59, log(evidence) = -1.457287, aw = 0.2720781, bw = 0.9270405, ah = 0.6113954, bh = 0.9867731
## 60, log(evidence) = -1.456486, aw = 0.2723851, bw = 0.9269046, ah = 0.6044818, bh = 0.9866535
## 61, log(evidence) = -1.455889, aw = 0.2726905, bw = 0.9267699, ah = 0.5974664, bh = 0.9865313
## 62, log(evidence) = -1.455475, aw = 0.2729715, bw = 0.9266353, ah = 0.5903158, bh = 0.9864064
## 63, log(evidence) = -1.455123, aw = 0.273229, bw = 0.9265011, ah = 0.5830669, bh = 0.9862789
## 64, log(evidence) = -1.454697, aw = 0.2734769, bw = 0.9263686, ah = 0.5757986, bh = 0.9861488
## 65, log(evidence) = -1.454134, aw = 0.2737247, bw = 0.9262393, ah = 0.5685917, bh = 0.9860161
## 66, log(evidence) = -1.453448, aw = 0.2739733, bw = 0.9261144, ah = 0.5615047, bh = 0.9858808
## 67, log(evidence) = -1.452687, aw = 0.2742239, bw = 0.9259944, ah = 0.5545732, bh = 0.985743
## 68, log(evidence) = -1.451889, aw = 0.2744845, bw = 0.9258796, ah = 0.5478191, bh = 0.9856029
## 69, log(evidence) = -1.451065, aw = 0.2747695, bw = 0.92577, ah = 0.5412558, bh = 0.9854604
## 70, log(evidence) = -1.450232, aw = 0.2750925, bw = 0.9256658, ah = 0.534884, bh = 0.9853157
## 71, log(evidence) = -1.449424, aw = 0.2754554, bw = 0.9255665, ah = 0.5286835, bh = 0.9851688
## 72, log(evidence) = -1.448692, aw = 0.2758423, bw = 0.9254716, ah = 0.5226112, bh = 0.9850198
## 73, log(evidence) = -1.448076, aw = 0.2762252, bw = 0.9253801, ah = 0.5166092, bh = 0.9848687
## 74, log(evidence) = -1.447556, aw = 0.2765769, bw = 0.9252913, ah = 0.5106332, bh = 0.9847156
## 75, log(evidence) = -1.447057, aw = 0.2768889, bw = 0.9252052, ah = 0.5046794, bh = 0.9845605
## 76, log(evidence) = -1.446523, aw = 0.2771799, bw = 0.9251224, ah = 0.4987779, bh = 0.9844035
## 77, log(evidence) = -1.445952, aw = 0.2774808, bw = 0.9250434, ah = 0.4929637, bh = 0.9842447
## 78, log(evidence) = -1.445368, aw = 0.2778135, bw = 0.9249682, ah = 0.4872582, bh = 0.9840841
## 79, log(evidence) = -1.444795, aw = 0.2781872, bw = 0.9248967, ah = 0.481665, bh = 0.9839218
## 80, log(evidence) = -1.444259, aw = 0.2785996, bw = 0.9248287, ah = 0.4761712, bh = 0.9837577
## 81, log(evidence) = -1.443774, aw = 0.2790389, bw = 0.9247638, ah = 0.4707554, bh = 0.9835921
## 82, log(evidence) = -1.443327, aw = 0.279494, bw = 0.9247017, ah = 0.4654015, bh = 0.9834248
## 83, log(evidence) = -1.442895, aw = 0.2799635, bw = 0.9246425, ah = 0.4601068, bh = 0.9832559
## 84, log(evidence) = -1.442461, aw = 0.280454, bw = 0.924586, ah = 0.4548759, bh = 0.9830855
## 85, log(evidence) = -1.442025, aw = 0.2809715, bw = 0.9245323, ah = 0.449711, bh = 0.9829136
## 86, log(evidence) = -1.441599, aw = 0.2815148, bw = 0.9244811, ah = 0.4446053, bh = 0.9827401
## 87, log(evidence) = -1.441197, aw = 0.2820768, bw = 0.9244321, ah = 0.4395422, bh = 0.9825652
## 88, log(evidence) = -1.440831, aw = 0.2826519, bw = 0.924385, ah = 0.4344983, bh = 0.9823889
## 89, log(evidence) = -1.440505, aw = 0.2832388, bw = 0.9243393, ah = 0.429445, bh = 0.9822111
## Rank = 3: Nsteps =90, log(evidence) =-1.440505, hyper = (0.2838348,0.9242947,0.4243521,0.9820318), dispersion = 1

The iteration maximizes log ML (per matrix elements) and terminates when its fractional change becomes smaller than Tol. The option criterion = connectivity can also be used. By default, hyperparameters of priors are also updated after hyper.update.n0 steps. As in maximum likelihood, multiple ranks can be specified:

sb <- vb_factorize(sb, ranks = seq(2,7), nrun = 5, verbose = 1, Tol = 1e-4, progress.bar = FALSE)

With nrun larger than 1, multiple inferences will be performed for each rank with different initial conditions and the solution with the highest ML will be chosen. The object after a vb_factorize run will have its measure slot filled:

measure(sb)
##   rank       lml        aw        bw        ah        bh nunif
## 1    2 -1.478562 0.3346618 1.3408942 0.6450167 1.0217398     0
## 2    3 -1.408709 0.3172265 0.9229522 0.1980555 0.9779020     0
## 3    4 -1.360458 0.2990188 0.7140489 0.1276132 0.9502710     0
## 4    5 -1.352421 0.2460885 0.5670790 0.1775114 0.9761457     0
## 5    6 -1.361693 0.1959246 0.4698160 0.2238407 0.9864859     0
## 6    7 -1.365712 0.1744965 0.4067136 0.2002811 0.9721059     0

For smaller sample sizes under larger rank values, columns of basis matrices may turn out to be uniform, which signifies that the corresponding cluster is redundant. By default (unif.stop=TRUE), if such a uniform column is found in the basis matrix, the rank scan will terminate with a warning. The last column of measure named as nunif counts the number of such uniform columns found if run under unif.stop=FALSE.

Plotting the object displays the log ML as a function of rank (Fig. 5):

plot(sb)
Dependence of log ML with rank.

Figure 5: Dependence of log ML with rank

The optimal rank is estimated from the rank-evidence profile by:

optimal_rank(sb)
## $type
## [1] 1
## 
## $ropt
## [1] 5

The heterogeneity class (type I or II) distinguishes cases where there is a clear and finite optimal rank (type I) from those where the evidence asymptotically reaches a maximal level (type II)1. ## Visualization The rank scan above using Bayesian inference correctly identifies \(r=5\) as the optimal rank. The fit results for each rank–from either maximum likelihood or Bayesian inference–are stored in sb@basis and sb@coeff. Both are lists of matrices of length equal to the number of rank values scanned. One can access them by, e.g.,

ranks(sb)
## [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
head(basis(sb)[ranks(sb)==5][[1]]) # basis matrix W for rank 5
##                 [,1]         [,2]         [,3]       [,4]       [,5]
## ISG15    0.023206648 0.0006021009 0.1109544957 0.09058517 0.04324770
## ENO1     0.092613970 0.0005987319 0.2745924752 0.10191373 0.07650346
## EFHD2    0.006295728 0.0005874597 0.0006342253 0.07982516 0.13007232
## RPL11    2.034263679 4.8258679506 2.6044726802 1.08495813 0.71331796
## SH3BGRL3 0.256090794 0.1387414170 1.1062409792 0.75028710 0.40457238
## CD52     0.674616257 0.4495106331 0.8612436312 0.03725878 0.08794072

Heatmaps of \(\sf W\) and \(\sf H\) matrices are displayed by feature_map() and cell_map(), respectively (Figs. 6-7):

feature_map(sb, markers = markers, rank = 5, max.per.cluster = 4, gene.name = rowData(sb)[,2],
         cexRow = 0.7)
Heatmap of basis matrix elements. Marker genes selected in rows, other than those provided as input, are based on the degree to which each features strongly in a particular cluster only and not in the rest. Columns represent the clusters.

Figure 6: Heatmap of basis matrix elements
Marker genes selected in rows, other than those provided as input, are based on the degree to which each features strongly in a particular cluster only and not in the rest. Columns represent the clusters.

In addition to the marker gene list provided as a parameter, the representative groups of genes for clusters are selected by the “max” scheme8: genes are sorted for each cluster with decreasing magnitudes of coefficient matrix elements, and among the top members of the list, those for which the magnitude is the actual maximum over all clusters are chosen. Based on the marker-metagene map in Fig. 6, we rename the clusters 1-5 as follows:

cell_type <- c('B_cell','CD8+_T','CD4+_T','Monocytes','NK')
colnames(basis(sb)[ranks(sb) == 5][[1]]) <- cell_type
rownames(coeff(sb)[ranks(sb) == 5][[1]]) <- cell_type
cell_map(sb, rank = 5)
Heatmap of cluster coefficient matrix elements. Rows indicate clusters and columns the cells.

Figure 7: Heatmap of cluster coefficient matrix elements
Rows indicate clusters and columns the cells.

In visualize_clusters(), each column of \(\sf H\) matrix is used to assign cells into clusters, and inter/intra-cluster separations are visualized using tSNE algorithm9. It uses the Rtsne() function of the Rtsne package. A barplot of cluster cell counts are also displayed (Fig: 8):

visualize_clusters(sb, rank = 5, cex = 0.7)
tSNE-based visualization of clustering. Coefficient matrix elements of cells were used as input with colors indicating predicted cluster assignment. The bar plot shows the cell counts of each cluster.

Figure 8: tSNE-based visualization of clustering
Coefficient matrix elements of cells were used as input with colors indicating predicted cluster assignment. The bar plot shows the cell counts of each cluster.

It is useful to extract hierarchical relationships among the clusters identified. This feature requires a series of inference outcomes for an uninterrupted range of rank values, e.g., from 2 to 7:

tree <- build_tree(sb, rmax = 5)
tree <- rename_tips(tree, rank = 5, tip.labels = cell_type)
plot_tree(tree, cex = 0.8, show.node.label = TRUE)
Hierarchical tree of clusters derived from varying ranks. The rank increases from 2 to 5 horizontally and nodes are labeled by cluster IDs which bifurcated in each rank.

Figure 9: Hierarchical tree of clusters derived from varying ranks
The rank increases from 2 to 5 horizontally and nodes are labeled by cluster IDs which bifurcated in each rank.

The build_tree function returns a list containing the tree. The second command above renames the label of terminal nodes by our cell type label. In Fig. 9, the relative distance between clusters can be seen to be consistent with the tSNE plot in Fig. 8.

References

1. Woo, J., Winterhoff, B. J., Starr, T. K., Aliferis, C. & Wang, J. De novo prediction of cell-type complexity in single-cell RNA-seq and tumor microenvironments. Life Sci. Alliance 2, e201900443 (2019).

2. Lee, D. D. & Seung, H. S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 788–791 (1999).

3. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. (2009).

4. Cemgil, A. T. Bayesian inference for nonnegative matrix factorisation models. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 785152 (2009).

5. Gaujoux, R. & Seoighe, C. A flexible R package for nonnegative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 367 (2010).

6. Zhu, X., Ching, T., Pan, X., Weissman, S. M. & Garmire, L. Detecting heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-Seq data by non-negative matrix factorization. PeerJ 5, e2888 (2017).

7. Brunet, J. P., Tamayo, P., Golub, T. R. & Mesirov, J. P. Metagenes and molecular pattern discovery using matrix factorization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4164–4169 (2004).

8. Carmona-Saez, P., Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Tirado, F., Carazo, J. M. & Pascual-Montano, A. Biclustering of gene expression data by non-smooth non-negative matrix factorization. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 78 (2006).

9. Maaten, L. van der & Hinton, G. Visualizing high-dimensional data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).